Tag Archives: Employees

by | April 13, 2012 · 1:21 am

Hospitality Industry Employee Risks: California Hotels And Restaurants Are "Not Obligated To Ensure Workers Take Legally Mandated Lunch Breaks"; Unanimous Opinion By State Supreme Court

“…the high court sided with businesses when it ruled that requiring companies to order breaks is unmanageable and those decisions should be left to workers. The decision provided clarity that businesses had sought regarding the law…”

In a case that affects thousands of businesses and millions of workers, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that employers are under no obligation to ensure that workers take legally mandated lunch breaks.

The unanimous opinion came after workers’ attorneys argued that abuses are routine and widespread when companies aren’t required to issue direct orders to take the breaks. They claimed employers take advantage of workers who don’t want to leave colleagues during busy times.

The case was initially filed nine years ago against Dallas-based Brinker International, the parent company of Chili’s and other eateries, by restaurant workers complaining of missed breaks in violation of California labor law.

The opinion written by Associate Justice Kathryn Werdegar explained that state law does not compel an employer to ensure employees cease all work during meal periods. Instead, an employee is at liberty to use the time as they choose, she wrote.

For more:  http://finance.yahoo.com/news/court-managers-dont-ensure-lunch-breaks-181751682.html

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employee Risks: California Hotels And Restaurants Are "Not Obligated To Ensure Workers Take Legally Mandated Lunch Breaks"; Unanimous Opinion By State Supreme Court

Filed under Labor Issues, Legislation, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | April 11, 2012 · 11:03 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Hotel And Restaurant Owners Should Consider Requiring Employees To Sign Arbitration Agreements Containing "Class Action Waivers"

“….conducting a wage and hour audit and educating management on wage and hour best practices…(and) requiring employees to sign arbitration agreements containing class action waivers…(can help) prevent employees from asserting wage and hour claims in the form of a class action lawsuit…”

Class action waivers received a boost by the U.S. Supreme Court last year in a widely publicized consumer class action case in which the court found them to be legally enforceable in a mandatory arbitration agreement. The AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion decision has caused some employers to consider including class action waiver language in employee arbitration agreements to prevent class/collective wage and hour lawsuits. However, courts are still struggling with the issue of whether the right to proceed as a class/collective action can be waived under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Waivers will be more likely to be upheld where they contain provisions providing fair relief for the employee, such as:

  • Employee chooses the venue for dispute resolution;
  • Employee is entitled to injunctive relief and punitive damages, if applicable; or
  • Employer pays some or all of the costs of the dispute resolution and/or waives claims for its own costs and fees.

For more:  http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0345c278-07bc-4308-bdf2-7c7b16f0ba84

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Hotel And Restaurant Owners Should Consider Requiring Employees To Sign Arbitration Agreements Containing "Class Action Waivers"

Filed under Claims, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | · 11:03 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Hotel And Restaurant Owners Should Consider Requiring Employees To Sign Arbitration Agreements Containing "Class Action Waivers"

“….conducting a wage and hour audit and educating management on wage and hour best practices…(and) requiring employees to sign arbitration agreements containing class action waivers…(can help) prevent employees from asserting wage and hour claims in the form of a class action lawsuit…”

Class action waivers received a boost by the U.S. Supreme Court last year in a widely publicized consumer class action case in which the court found them to be legally enforceable in a mandatory arbitration agreement. The AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion decision has caused some employers to consider including class action waiver language in employee arbitration agreements to prevent class/collective wage and hour lawsuits. However, courts are still struggling with the issue of whether the right to proceed as a class/collective action can be waived under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Waivers will be more likely to be upheld where they contain provisions providing fair relief for the employee, such as:

  • Employee chooses the venue for dispute resolution;
  • Employee is entitled to injunctive relief and punitive damages, if applicable; or
  • Employer pays some or all of the costs of the dispute resolution and/or waives claims for its own costs and fees.

For more:  http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0345c278-07bc-4308-bdf2-7c7b16f0ba84

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Hotel And Restaurant Owners Should Consider Requiring Employees To Sign Arbitration Agreements Containing "Class Action Waivers"

Filed under Claims, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | April 7, 2012 · 1:49 am

Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Labor Department Investigation Forces Massachussetts Restaurants To Repay Employees For Back Wages And Incorrect Overtime

“…investigation found that several restaurants “violated the FLSA by paying  employees flat salaries for all hours worked without overtime pay, failing to  combine hours worked at multiple locations for overtime purposes, paying  incorrect overtime rates to tipped employees, making illegal deductions from  employees’ wages and failing to keep accurate records of employees’ hours….”

“…Even  more serious, our investigations found an emerging trend of misclassifying  restaurant workers as independent contractors in order to avoid minimum wage,  overtime and record-keeping requirements of the FLSA.”

Dozens of eateries around the state are paying employees for back wages as a  result of an ongoing enforcement initiative conducted by the U.S. Department of  Labor.

To date, investigations by the Boston District Office of the department’s  Wage and Hour Division have found $1,307,808 in back wages due to 478 employees  of 34 different Massachusetts restaurants.

Fifteen Not Your Average Joe’s locations have been cited, including the one  on Enon Street in Beverly, which is to pay nine employees a total of $44,201.73  in back wages.

The investigation, according to a release by the U.S. Department of Labor,  uncovered significant violations of the minimum wage, overtime and  record-keeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act in many Massachusetts  restaurants.

Read more: Beverly restaurant to pay employees for back wages – Beverly, MA – Beverly Citizen http://www.wickedlocal.com/beverly/newsnow/x221034920/Beverly-restaurant-to-pay-employees-for-back-wages#ixzz1rJqNdvfO

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Labor Department Investigation Forces Massachussetts Restaurants To Repay Employees For Back Wages And Incorrect Overtime

Filed under Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | March 31, 2012 · 9:12 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Wisconsin Restaurant Sued By EEOC For "Racial Discrimination" And "Wrongful Termination"

“..(the restaurant management) made a bad situation worse by firing the man who had the guts to stand up to it…the EEOC will stand up for people (like this employee)…”

“…the EEOC is seeking back pay, job reinstatement, compensatory and punitive damages…”

A restaurant in Menomonie, Wis., is being sued by the federal government because its managers posted images of a noose, a Klan hood and other racist depictions that prompted a black employee to complain and then be fired. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, filed Tuesday against the owners of Sparx Restaurant & Bar, alleges that Dion Miller was fired in retaliation for complaining about the racist atmosphere that the images conveyed.

According to the suit:

Miller arrived for a regular shift and found taped to the cooler a picture of black actor Gary Coleman and a dollar bill that was defaced with a noose around the neck of a black-faced George Washington. Also on the dollar bill were swastikas and the image of a man in a Ku Klux Klan hood.

Sparx’s managers told Miller that they had posted the images the evening before and insisted that it was just “a joke.”

Miller was fired within weeks of complaining for allegedly having “a bad attitude.”

The suit was filed after an attempt at a settlement with the restaurant’s owner, Northern Star Hospitality Inc., failed.

“Sparx bills itself as a ‘family restaurant’ even as its managers posted imagery which evokes shameful memories of racially motivated physical attacks and lynchings,” John Hendrickson, regional attorney for the Chicago district of the EEOC, said in a statement Wednesday announcing the lawsuit.

For more:  http://www.startribune.com/local/144690225.html

4 Comments

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | · 9:12 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Wisconsin Restaurant Sued By EEOC For "Racial Discrimination" And "Wrongful Termination"

“..(the restaurant management) made a bad situation worse by firing the man who had the guts to stand up to it…the EEOC will stand up for people (like this employee)…”

“…the EEOC is seeking back pay, job reinstatement, compensatory and punitive damages…”

A restaurant in Menomonie, Wis., is being sued by the federal government because its managers posted images of a noose, a Klan hood and other racist depictions that prompted a black employee to complain and then be fired. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, filed Tuesday against the owners of Sparx Restaurant & Bar, alleges that Dion Miller was fired in retaliation for complaining about the racist atmosphere that the images conveyed.

According to the suit:

Miller arrived for a regular shift and found taped to the cooler a picture of black actor Gary Coleman and a dollar bill that was defaced with a noose around the neck of a black-faced George Washington. Also on the dollar bill were swastikas and the image of a man in a Ku Klux Klan hood.

Sparx’s managers told Miller that they had posted the images the evening before and insisted that it was just “a joke.”

Miller was fired within weeks of complaining for allegedly having “a bad attitude.”

The suit was filed after an attempt at a settlement with the restaurant’s owner, Northern Star Hospitality Inc., failed.

“Sparx bills itself as a ‘family restaurant’ even as its managers posted imagery which evokes shameful memories of racially motivated physical attacks and lynchings,” John Hendrickson, regional attorney for the Chicago district of the EEOC, said in a statement Wednesday announcing the lawsuit.

For more:  http://www.startribune.com/local/144690225.html

4 Comments

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | March 7, 2012 · 1:46 am

Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Hotel Management Compliance Audits Can Expose Potential Labor Department "Wage And Hour Division" Violations

• Make sure nonexempt employees are paid the required minimum wage. The current federal rate is $7.25 per hour (some jurisdictions require a higher rate).  Review deductions to ensure that they do not cut employees’ pay below the minimum wage.
• Be certain nonexempt employees are paid the required overtime. Ensure that all bonuses, shift differentials, service charges and other payments are properly included in computing overtime and that deductions do not improperly cut into overtime pay. 
• Pay special attention to whether nonexempt employees accurately record all worktime. Nonexempt employees must record pre- and post-shift work; shift-change overlap; opening or closing activities; compensable training time, meeting time, “on-call” work; and time spent doing work at home. Employees must record meal time and other non-compensable break time, and they must be paid when they do not take that time off. 
• Be sure that all “exempt” employees meet the requirements for exemption. Review the criteria defining who may be treated as exempt from the Fair Labor Standard Act’s minimum-wage and/or overtime requirements. “Salaried” employees are not necessarily exempt. Certain positions such as sous chefs and sales managers are vulnerable to challenge. 
• Make certain that exempt employees are paid on a salary basis. The most common FLSA exemptions require that such employees be paid on a “salary basis” and thus receive a fixed, predetermined amount for every workweek in which the employee performs any work, without regard to the number of days or hours worked or the quality of work. Salary deductions are very limited. 
• Strictly comply with child-labor restrictions. There is an age 16 limit for general occupations and an age 18 limit for occupations declared “hazardous” by the U.S. Secretary of Labor. 14 and 15 year olds may be employed in limited occupations, within strict hours and times of day limitations. Identify every employee who is 16 or 17, verify his or her age and exact duties. Identify every employee under 16, verify his or her age, exact duties and hours and times of work.
• Comply with all state and local wage-hour requirements. The FLSA does not preempt tougher state or local provisions. These other laws might include a higher minimum wage; daily overtime; minimum pay for reporting to work; more rigorous child-labor limitations; prohibitions on wage deductions; and time limits for paying employees who resign or are fired.

For more:  http://www.hotelnewsnow.com/Articles.aspx/7679/Government-audits-Get-your-house-in-order

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Hotel Management Compliance Audits Can Expose Potential Labor Department "Wage And Hour Division" Violations

Filed under Labor Issues, Liability, Maintenance, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | March 2, 2012 · 8:03 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Florida Hotel Sued By U.S. Dept Of Labor For "Dodging Taxes By Paying Employees Entirely In Cash" And Denying Overtime

“…The U.S. Department of Labor says the Cavalier Hotel and Crab Shack on Ocean Drive owes its employees $160,000 and that owner Ralph Abravaya skirted taxes by paying his employees in tips and refusing them overtime pay…”

“…Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, says a two-year investigation revealed Abravaya had dodged taxes by paying employees entirely in cash. He also underpaid them by denying them overtime when they worked more than 40 hours per week..”

An art deco hotel on South Beach is locked in a battle with the federal government over the kind of accusations that have gotten the 99 percent so riled up recently.

 “Yeah we screwed up,” Abravaya admits to Riptide. “Alright, so slap me in the hand. But don’t tell me you are going to destroy the business or fine me $300,000. If Abravaya loses in court, he will have to pay a total of $320,000 in fines and unpaid wages, plus court costs.

The hotelier admits that a manager did falsify records in an attempt to escape investigation. But Abravaya says he fired the employee as soon as he learned of the deception. He insists that when he took over the hotel and restaurant in 2009, he simply continued the policy set by the previous owner and paid the employees $6 an hour plus their tips — more than they were owed by law.

For more:  http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2012/03/cavalier_hotel_and_crab_shack.php

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Florida Hotel Sued By U.S. Dept Of Labor For "Dodging Taxes By Paying Employees Entirely In Cash" And Denying Overtime

Filed under Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | February 29, 2012 · 8:01 am

Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Hotel Management And Owners Must Have Firm And Comprehensive Policies For Hiring And Classifying New Employees

Hiring

Background checks are routine now, but one size does not fit all, explained Paul Wagner, shareholder of Ithaca, New York-based Stoke Roberts & Wagner. Know the different rules for each jurisdiction.

  • Beware of process and policy around background checks, where decisions might create discrimination issues related to U.S. Title VIII, or the Fair Housing Act, said David Sherwyn, professor at the Cornell University School, of Hotel Administration.
  • Ensure new hires don’t have restrictive covenants from prior employers, said Gregg Gilman, partner with New York-based law firm Davis & Gilbert LLP. Be sure to tell new hires explicitly, “We don’t’ want your former employers’ trade secrets.” “We’re seeing more and more of this kind of litigation,” Gilman said, adding it’s very expensive and disruptive to defend.

Classifications

 The U.S. Department of Labor’s definition of an independent contractor is not the only factor used in determining who is an employee. The courts use a more expansive test when determining who can file Title VII claims, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin, Sherwyn said. “The issue here is that people sometimes relax a little bit with contractors,” he said. Even if someone is not directly employed by your organization (i.e. a contractor) that person can still bring litigation against you.

  •  In light of increased enforcement by the DOL, companies should have protocols in place before classifying independent contractors, Gilman said. Have a written agreement stating the independent contractor is just that. And avoid the “perma-lancer,” or those permanent freelancers, who are more likely to be classified as regular employees, he said.
  • Self audit often, said Ilene Berman, a partner with Atlanta-based Taylor English Duma LLP. Annually review any exempt employee with “assistant” in the name as well as sous chefs and sales managers. Those are the positions most frequently targeted by plaintiff attorneys.
  • Check local and state laws because exempt in other states does not mean exempt in California, said Nancy Yaffe, partner with Los Angeles-based Fox Rothschild LLP. California is a different beast, she added. You have to analyze employee classifications on a continuous basis.

For more:  http://www.hotelnewsnow.com/Articles.aspx/7647/26-legal-tips-for-hotel-HR-professionals

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Hotel Management And Owners Must Have Firm And Comprehensive Policies For Hiring And Classifying New Employees

Filed under Labor Issues, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | February 25, 2012 · 9:26 am

Hospitality Industry Employee Risks: Pennsylvania Hotel Manager Charged With Felony Theft For "Activating Company Credit Card" And Making Over $20,000 In Purchases

“….(the former manager) …obtained and activated a credit card without the knowledge of the owners of Mifflinburg Hotel Inc./Scarlet D while he was employed as the manager…(he) then made numerous purchases from Oct. 13, 2010, through Oct. 7…”

A former manager at the Scarlet D/Mifflinburg Hotel is facing several felony theft charges after he allegedly activated a credit card in the business’ name and made purchases totaling $20,363.32.

David Alan Burns, 56, of 121 Georgetown Lane, Milton, was arrested and charged with felony counts of forgery-unauthorized act in writing, access device fraud, theft by deception, theft by failure to make required dispositions of funds received and receiving stolen property. He was arraigned and released on $25,000 unsecured bail.

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employee Risks: Pennsylvania Hotel Manager Charged With Felony Theft For "Activating Company Credit Card" And Making Over $20,000 In Purchases

Filed under Crime, Labor Issues, Liability, Maintenance, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Theft

Tagged as , , ,