Tag Archives: Employment Discrimination

by | September 23, 2013 · 5:47 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: North Carolina Restaurant Operator Sued By EEOC For “Religious Discrimination”; Fired Woman For Wearing Skirts As Part Of Her Pentecostal Church Beliefs

“…(the employee, Sheila Silver, was) a member of the Pentecostal church (and believed) women should wear skirts in accordance with this EEOCreligious belief…Silver worked for various Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants since 1992.  Scottish Food Systems and Laurinburg KFC Take Home purchased the KFC restaurant where Silver worked in April 2013.  At that time, they informed Silver she must wear pants to work because of their dress code policy.  Silver told Scottish Food Systems and Laurinburg KFC Take Home she could not wear pants because of her religious beliefs.  The companies ultimately fired her for refusing to wear pants to work…”

Scottish Food Systems, Inc. and Laurinburg KFC Take Home, Inc., two North Carolina corporations that operate a chain of Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants in eastern North Carolina, violated federal law by failing to accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs and firing her because of her religion, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in an employment discrimination lawsuit filed today.

Such alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which requires employers to reasonably accommodate an employees’ due to their religious beliefs as long as doing so does not pose an undue hardship.  The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina (EEOC v. Scottish Food Systems, Inc. d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken and Laurinburg KFC Take Home, Inc. d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken, Civil Action No. 1:13-CV-00796) after first attempting to reach a voluntary settlement through its conciliation process.  The EEOC seeks back pay, compensatory damages and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief.

“Employers must respect employees’ sincerely held religious beliefs and carefully consider requests made by employees based on those beliefs,” said Lynette A. Barnes, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Charlotte District Office, which includes the EEOC’s Raleigh Area Office, where the charge of discrimination was filed. “This case demonstrates the EEOC’s continued commitment to fighting religious discrimination in the workplace.”

The EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment.  Further information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

For more:  http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/9-19-13c.cfm

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: North Carolina Restaurant Operator Sued By EEOC For “Religious Discrimination”; Fired Woman For Wearing Skirts As Part Of Her Pentecostal Church Beliefs

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , , , , ,

by | May 18, 2013 · 6:48 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: EEOC Issues Revised Protections Against “Disability Discrimination” Including “Employees With Cancer, Diabetes, Epilepsy And Intellectual Disabilities”

Disability discrimination also occurs when a covered employer or other entity treats an applicant or employee less favorably because she has a history of a disability (such as cancer that is controlled or in remission) or because she is believed to have a physical or mental impairment that EEOCis not transitory (lasting or expected to last six months or less) and minor (even if she does not have such an impairment).

The law requires an employer to provide reasonable accommodation to an employee or job applicant with a disability, unless doing so would cause significant difficulty or expense for the employer (“undue hardship”).

The law also protects people from discrimination based on their relationship with a person with a disability (even if they do not themselves have a disability). For example, it is illegal to discriminate against an employee because her husband has a disability.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) today issued four revised documents on protection against disability discrimination, pursuant to the goal of the agency’s Strategic Plan to provide up-to-date guidance on the requirements of antidiscrimination laws.

The documents address how the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies to applicants and employees with cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, and intellectual disabilities. These documents are available on the agency’s website at “Disability Discrimination, The Question and Answer Series,” http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/disability.cfm.

“Nearly 34 million Americans have been diagnosed with cancer, diabetes, or epilepsy, and more than 2 million have an intellectual disability,” said EEOC Chair Jacqueline A. Berrien. “Many of them are looking for jobs or are already in the workplace. While there is a considerable amount of general information available about the ADA, the EEOC often is asked questions about how the ADA applies to these conditions.”

In plain, easy-to-understand language, the revised documents reflect the changes to the definition of disability made by the ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA) that make it easier to conclude that individuals with a wide range of impairments, including cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, and intellectual disabilities, are protected by the ADA. Each of the documents also answers questions about topics such as: when an employer may obtain medical information from applicants and employees; what types of reasonable accommodations individuals with these particular disabilities might need; how an employer should handle safety concerns; and what an employer should do to prevent and correct disability-based harassment.

For more:  http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/5-15-13.cfm

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: EEOC Issues Revised Protections Against “Disability Discrimination” Including “Employees With Cancer, Diabetes, Epilepsy And Intellectual Disabilities”

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Labor Issues, Legislation, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , ,

by | April 17, 2013 · 7:22 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Hotel And Restaurant Hiring Policies Must Be Neutral On Employee “Sex Stereoyping”; EEOC To Enforce “Broad Definition Of Sex Discrimination”

The EEOC Title VII effort to protect LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) workers relies on a broad definition of sex discrimination, treating harassment and discrimination claims under a “sex stereotyping” theory…The EEOC’s new emphasis on LGBT protections will shape its EEOCfuture en­­force­­ment and litigation against private employers, especially in states that don’t protect gender identity or sexual orientation. Expect the EEOC to educate the LGBT community about its recent rulings. Also expect more charges and more vigorous investigations…Make sure your policies are neutral with regard to sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and prohibit harassment based on sexual preference, gender stereotypes or intolerance.

Federal law doesn’t prohibit discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) workers. Instead, LGBT protections are a varied patchwork of judicial and agency interpretations and state and local laws that make discrimination actionable only under specific circumstances. LGBT workers continue to face employment discrimination with relatively few legal protections.

In response, the EEOC has begun an effort to protect LGBT workers’ rights by broadly interpreting Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC’s newly released Strategic Enforcement Plan for 2013-2016 lists “coverage of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals under Title VII” as one of its top six national en­­forcement priorities. Expect the EEOC to take significant enforcement actions soon and litigate issues more aggressively.

No national law explicitly bans workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Title VII’s language only protects individuals on the basis of “race, color, religion, sex, or natural origin.” LGBT advocates have tried to amend Title VII to add sexual orientation, expression and identity, but have consistently failed.

For more:  http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/35121/eeoc-steps-up-efforts-to-protect-against-lgbt-bias-harassment

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Hotel And Restaurant Hiring Policies Must Be Neutral On Employee “Sex Stereoyping”; EEOC To Enforce “Broad Definition Of Sex Discrimination”

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , , , , , ,

by | January 9, 2013 · 7:34 am

Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Maryland Restaurant Settles EEOC “Disability Discrimination And Retaliation Lawsuit” For $47,000; Deaf Prep Cook Was Harassed And Mocked

“…(the plaintiff) was harassed by a former management official because of his disability, through mockery (e.g. being called “vermin” instead of “Vernon”), and through threatening physical conduct…(his) prep cook EEOCduties were removed and that he was transferred to a dishwasher position because of his disability….In addition to the $47,814 in monetary relief to Davis, the two-year consent decree resolving the lawsuit enjoins McCormick and Schmick’s from violating the ADA, including with regard to harassment and retaliation…”

McCormick & Schmick’s Seafood Restaurant, Inc. will pay $47,814 and provide other relief to settle a disability discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

According to the EEOC’s suit, Vernon Davis, who has been deaf since childhood and uses American Sign Language and reads lips to communicate, satisfactorily performed his duties as a prep cook at the McCormick & Schmick’s National Harbor restaurant in Oxon Hill, Md. Prior to being hired by the defendant, Davis had obtained culinary training and had worked in several other restaurants.

After Davis and others complained about Davis being subjected to disability discrimination, the restaurant demoted him to a janitorial-type position and cut his hours because of his disability and in retaliation for the complaints, the EEOC charged. Four months later, McCormick and Schmick’s unlawfully fired Davis because of his disability and in retaliation for his complaints, the EEOC alleged in its lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Southern Division, Civil Action No. 8:11-cv-02695.

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Maryland Restaurant Settles EEOC “Disability Discrimination And Retaliation Lawsuit” For $47,000; Deaf Prep Cook Was Harassed And Mocked

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Training

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | December 25, 2012 · 8:25 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Oregon Restaurant Employee Awarded $70,000 In "Unlawful Employment Practices" Lawsuit; Woman Claimed Discrimination After Filing For Workers' Compensation

“…the (plaintiff) was placed in a position to work near heat, which caused a re-blistering of the wound, according to the lawsuit…(her) physician contacted the worker’s compensation carrier again to say she was to Hospitality Industry Lawsuitwork on modified duties without exposure to heat, the lawsuit states KFC continued to expose Vargas to heat in the workplace…”

“…her physician instructed her not to return to work because KFC was not able to follow the modified duty requirement. Vargas then told her employer she could not return to work until her burn healed…two days later, KFC terminated her employment, stating that Vargas had resigned…”

A Salem woman was awarded more than $70,000 after a lawsuit she filed against Chick Inc., the Salem company that owns three KFC franchises, for unlawful employment practices. Jurors unanimously found in favor of plaintiff Sarai Vargas, who claimed she was wrongfully discharged and that she experienced discrimination after filing for workers compensation because of a workplace burn. A four-day trial ended Dec. 14.

While wearing protective gloves, Vargas suffered second-degree burns after grease splattered on her right arm as she pulled chicken from the grill oven May 9, 2010, Vargas’ lawyer Larry Linder said.

Vargas was treated by a doctor for the burn and was cleared to return to work on a modified duty, which included light activity with no exposure to heat, Linder said.

For more:  http://www.statesmanjournal.com/article/20121225/NEWS/312250021/Woman-who-took-KFC-court-wins-70-000

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Oregon Restaurant Employee Awarded $70,000 In "Unlawful Employment Practices" Lawsuit; Woman Claimed Discrimination After Filing For Workers' Compensation

Filed under Claims, Employment Practices Liability, Injuries, Insurance, Labor Issues, Management And Ownership, Training

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | October 11, 2012 · 6:11 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Nevada Hotel Settles Employment Discrimination Lawsuit With Justice Department For $49,000; Must Implement New Employment Eligibility Verification Policies

“Employers may not treat authorized workers differently during the employment eligibility verification and reverification process based on their citizenship status or national origin,” said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division.

Under the settlement agreement, Tuscany will pay $49,000 in civil penalties to the United States and full back pay to a victim.  In addition to corrective action already taken, Tuscany also agrees to implement new employment eligibility verification policies and procedures that treat all employees equally regardless of citizenship status, conduct training of its human resources staff on their responsibilities to avoid discrimination in the employment eligibility verification process, and be subject to reporting and monitoring requirements.

The Justice Department today reached an agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino LLC in Las Vegas resolving a lawsuit alleging that the company discriminated in the employment eligibility verification and re-verification process.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) requires employers to treat all authorized workers equally during the hiring, firing and employment eligibility verification process, regardless of their national origin or citizenship status.

The department’s case, filed on May 11, 2012, alleged that Tuscany treated non-citizens differently from U.S. citizens during the employment eligibility verification and reverification process.   The complaint alleged the casino required non-citizen employees to provide more or different documents or information than it required from citizen employees during the initial employment eligibility verification process.  According to the complaint, the company then used the documents or information it gathered to impose improper document requests on non-citizens during the reverification process as a condition of continued employment.
The complaint further alleged that the casino subjected non-citizen employees’ documents to a heightened review process by senior human resources representatives that was not applied to documents presented by U.S. citizens.

For more:  http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/drug-law/justice-department-settles-lawsuit-against-las-vegas-casino-unfair-documentary

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Nevada Hotel Settles Employment Discrimination Lawsuit With Justice Department For $49,000; Must Implement New Employment Eligibility Verification Policies

Filed under Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , ,

by | September 30, 2012 · 7:06 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Texas Restaurant Chain Sued By EEOC For Firing "Pregnant Employees Under A Discriminatory Written Policy"

“…According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, Maryann Castillo and other female workers were laid off after the third month of their pregnancies under a written policy, set out in Bayou City Wings’ employee handbook…”

JC Wings Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Bayou City Wings, a Baytown-based restaurant chain, violated federal law when its managers laid off pregnant employees under a discriminatory policy, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit it filed today.

  Bayou City Wings owns and operates restaurants in Baytown, Houston and surrounding areas.  The company’s district manager laid off Castillo pursuant to the policy even though she had provided a doctor’s note that indicated she could work up to the 36th week of her pregnancy and that her doctor had not placed any restrictions on her ability to work.

During the EEOC’s investigation of a discrimination charge brought by Castillo, Bayou City Wings named eight female employees who were laid off from work because of their pregnancies.  According to a Bayou City Wings general store manager, for a manager to keep a pregnant employee at work any longer would “be irresponsible in respect to her child’s safety” and would jeopardize his position with the company “for not following procedures.”

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex or pregnancy.  The EEOC filed suit (Civil Action No. 4:12-cv-02885) in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.   The EEOC seeks an injunction, back pay with pre-judgment interest, reinstatement or front pay, compensatory damages and punitive damages, in amounts to be determined at trial.

For more:  http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/9-12-26d.cfm

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Texas Restaurant Chain Sued By EEOC For Firing "Pregnant Employees Under A Discriminatory Written Policy"

Filed under Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | September 22, 2012 · 6:04 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Indiana Hotel Settles "Racial Discrimination Lawsuit" With EEOC For $355,000

The operators of an Indianapolis hotel have agreed to pay $355,000 to settle allegations they underpaid and fired African-American housekeepers because of their race…the settlement will be divided among 75 employees or job applicants.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced Friday that it had filed a consent degree in federal court with     Noble Management LLC and New Indianapolis Hotels LLC, which operate the Hampton Inn on Shadeland Avenue on Indianapolis’ north side.

The agency says the companies also retaliated against black employees who complained about racial bias. The EEOC also says the hotel regularly excluded African-American job applicants who were equally or better qualified than the Hispanic applicants it hired as housekeepers.

For more:  http://www.ibj.com/indy-hotel-to-pay–355-000-to-settle-race-lawsuit/PARAMS/article/36844

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Indiana Hotel Settles "Racial Discrimination Lawsuit" With EEOC For $355,000

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | June 5, 2012 · 6:26 am

Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: U.S. Justice Dept. Files "Employment Discrimination Lawsuit" Against Nevada Hotel; "Pattern Of Unlawful Eligibility Verification"

“…The suit alleges the property  engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination in the employment eligibility verification and reverification process…The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) requires employers to treat all authorized workers equally during the hiring, firing and employment eligibility verification process, regardless of their national origin or citizenship status.”

The suit seeks an unspecified fine and “full remedial relief to work-authorized non-U.S. citizen employees for the losses they have suffered, including back pay and reinstatement.”

The U.S. Justice Department is suing the Tuscany Suites & Casino in Las Vegas over allegations the property discriminated against non-U.S. citizen job applicants and employees over a five-year period. The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division in Washington, D.C., last week announced it filed a lawsuit against the hotel-casino in the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer of the agency and served  the company on May 29. The complaint alleges:

  • Tuscany treated non-citizens differently from U.S. citizens during the employment eligibility verification and reverification process by requesting non-citizen employees provide more or different documents or information than was required.
  • Tuscany subjected lawful permanent residents to unnecessary reverification procedures based on their citizenship status. These are workers with Permanent Resident Cards (green cards).

The suit says the Tuscany had been hit with a discrimination complaint in early 2011 by an unidentified “charging party,” and that in October the Justice Department’s Office of Special Counsel notified the Tuscany “it was expanding the investigation to include a possible pattern or practice of document abuse against non-U.S. citizens.”

For more:  http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2012/jun/04/justice-department-alleges-las-vegas-casino-discri/

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: U.S. Justice Dept. Files "Employment Discrimination Lawsuit" Against Nevada Hotel; "Pattern Of Unlawful Eligibility Verification"

Filed under Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | May 9, 2012 · 6:28 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Texas Hotel Sued By Former Conference Meetings Director For "Employment Discrimination"; Woman Claims Termination Due To Cancer Diagnosis

“…(the Texas woman) believes Crowne Plaza Hotel fired her because of insurance, knowing she had more follow-up surgeries required…(she) is now cancer free and has a new job, hopes to collect financial damages for medical bills and mental anguish…”

A Texas grandmother of five says she was wrongfully fired from her job because she got cancer. Now, she’s suing for employment discrimination.

Janet Hustus, 53, was working as the Conference Meetings Director for Crowne Plaza Houston in January 2011 when she was diagnosed with breast cancer. “I was devastated. When you hear those words it is very devastating,” Hustus said. “You have cancer, and you don’t know what to do. You have so many emotions.”

She went to her general manager a few days later to discuss her schedule and surgery dates. Hustus says Mathers assured her the company would work around her schedule and “support her any way possible,” including keeping her job open for her.

For more: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/texas-grandma-fired-cancer/story?id=16304786

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Texas Hotel Sued By Former Conference Meetings Director For "Employment Discrimination"; Woman Claims Termination Due To Cancer Diagnosis

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Health, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership

Tagged as , , , ,