Tag Archives: Legal Risks

by | December 7, 2012 · 8:59 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Florida Hotel And Spa Sued For "Sexual Abuse" Of Woman During Massage; Masseuse Used "Inappropriate Draping Techniques" And Contact

“…The suit alleges masseuse failed to use appropriate draping techniques and within 10-15 minutes, Hospitality Industry Lawsuitshe was completely naked…he proceeded to “massage” her exposed breast and lower belly, saying it was a technique in which he specialized, according to her attorney…”

A woman and her attorney have filed a lawsuit against a Miami Beach spa after she claimed she was sexually abused by a masseuse. According to the lawsuit filed in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court early Thursday morning, the unnamed woman went to the Sanctuary Hotel on South Beach with her husband on Feb. 20th and purchased a massage at the Sanctuary Spa & Salon through Groupon.

According to the suit, Fraga continued the sexual conduct by rubbing between her buttocks, legs and private parts and placed his penis in her hand. The woman has sued the Sanctuary Hotel Group, Inc.

For more:  http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/12/06/lawsuit-woman-alleges-sex-abuse-by-masseuse-at-sobe-spa/

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Florida Hotel And Spa Sued For "Sexual Abuse" Of Woman During Massage; Masseuse Used "Inappropriate Draping Techniques" And Contact

Filed under Labor Issues, Liability, Training

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | December 4, 2012 · 8:02 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Kentucky Restaurants Sued By Cities For "Multiple False Alarms"; Thousands Of Dollars In Unpaid Fines

“…The city has filed 37 lawsuits in recent weeks — with at least 13 more pending — against the most egregious offenders, seeking thousands of dollars in unpaid fines and hoping to send a message about fixing alarms that False_Alarmswaste police time and cost taxpayer dollars…”

More than 40 times since 2008, Louisville Metro Police Department officers have made emergency runs to the Taco Bell on East Broadway, only to find they were responding to a false alarm.

Under a policy enacted in June 2005 that aims to crack down on residents and businesses who have multiple false alarms, the city has fined the Taco Bell — repeatedly — up to $500 per false alarm.

But the restaurant, like some others, has not paid its fines, which now total $10,700, according to city records.

Before police began charging fees for false burglary and hold-up alarms in 2005, officers were responding to more than 40,000 false alarms a year, Gibson said. Since then, that number has fallen dramatically, with less than 20,000 false alarm runs through October of this year.

For more:  http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20121203/NEWS01/312030096/City-sues-collect-false-alarm-fines?odyssey=nav|head

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Kentucky Restaurants Sued By Cities For "Multiple False Alarms"; Thousands Of Dollars In Unpaid Fines

Filed under Labor Issues, Liability, Maintenance, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | December 1, 2012 · 7:18 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Hotels Warned By Federal Trade Commission (FTC) For "Deceptively Low" Estimates Of Room Costs; Undisclosed "Resort Fees" May Violate Law

 “One common complaint consumers raised involved mandatory fees hotels charge for amenities such as newspapers, use of onsite exercise or pool facilities, or internet access, sometimes referred to as ‘resort fees.’  FTCThese mandatory fees can be as high as $30 per night, a sum that could certainly affect consumer purchasing decisions.”

The Federal Trade Commission has warned 22 hotel operators that their online reservation sites may violate the law by providing a deceptively low estimate of what consumers can expect to pay for their hotel rooms.

The warning letters cited consumer complaints that surfaced at a recent conference the FTC held on “drip pricing,” a pricing technique in which firms advertise only part of a product’s price and reveal other charges as the customer goes through the buying process.   The warning letters also state that consumers often did not know they would be required to pay resort fees in addition to the quoted hotel rate.

“Consumers are entitled to know in advance the total cost of their hotel stays,” said Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jon Leibowitz.  “So-called ‘drip pricing’ charges, sometimes portrayed as ‘convenience’ or ‘service’ fees, are anything but convenient, and businesses that hide them are doing a huge disservice to American consumers.”

The letters strongly encourage the companies to review their websites and ensure that their ads do not misrepresent the total price consumers can expect to pay.

For more:  http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2012/11/hotelresort.shtm

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Hotels Warned By Federal Trade Commission (FTC) For "Deceptively Low" Estimates Of Room Costs; Undisclosed "Resort Fees" May Violate Law

Filed under Guest Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | November 20, 2012 · 7:22 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Colorado-Based Restaurant Group Will Defend Itself Against Class-Action Lawsuit Alleging Overtime Violations; Company Maintains That Managerial Salaried Employees Are "Apprentices"

“…The class-action complaint…says Chipotle misclassified its “apprentices” as managerial salaried employees who don’t qualify for overtime pay. The suit contends apprentices earn salaries of $40,000 but frequently work more than 40 hours a week and often perform the duties of hourly workers, including cooking and filling orders…”

Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. says a lawsuit alleging the Colorado- based company has failed to pay overtime to hundreds of employees is frivolous.

Chipotle spokesman Chris Arnold said the restaurant chain carefully defines the roles in its restaurants and that the apprentice position is “clearly” a managerial role ineligible for overtime, under state and federal laws.

The lawsuit seeks back pay and damages. Chipotle has about 1,350 restaurants.

For more:  http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/west/2012/11/19/271081.htm

2 Comments

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Insurance, Labor Issues, Management And Ownership, Training

Tagged as , , , , , , , ,

by | November 19, 2012 · 7:26 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Michigan Hotel Sued By EEOC For "Terminating Pregnant Housekeeper"; Employers May Not Exclude Pregnant Women Based On Their "Concerns About Safety Of Unborn Child"

“…Ramin fired a housekeeper shortly after it learned of her pregnancy. The company stated that it could not allow her to continue to work as a housekeeper because of the potential harm to the development of her baby…”

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit today charging that Ramin, Inc., a Comfort Inn & Suites franchise owner in Taylor, Mich., violated federal law when it terminated a pregnant housekeeper because of her pregnancy.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, protects female employees against discrimination based on pregnancy, and the Supreme Court has expressly rejected the notion that an employer may exclude pregnant women from employment based on its own concerns about the safety of the unborn child.

The EEOC seeks injunctive relief to prevent Ramin from discriminating against pregnant employees or applicants in the future, as well as monetary relief on behalf of the victim.  The EEOC filed suit after first attempting to settle the case through its conciliation process.

“Pregnancy discrimination is rarely subtle,” said Lauren Gibbs Burstein, attorney in the EEOC’s Detroit Field Office.  “Employers may not bar pregnant employees from work because of outdated myths or stereotypes.  The EEOC will vigorously defend the rights of pregnant workers to provide for their families by remaining employed.”

For more:  http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-13-12c.cfm

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Michigan Hotel Sued By EEOC For "Terminating Pregnant Housekeeper"; Employers May Not Exclude Pregnant Women Based On Their "Concerns About Safety Of Unborn Child"

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | November 13, 2012 · 7:41 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: New Jersey Hotels Sued For "Price Goughing" During Superstorm Sandy; Fines Up To $10,000

“…(the state sued) a Howard Johnson Express in Parsippany…New Jersey law defines price gouging as an “excessive price increase,” or of 10 percent or more, during a declared state of emergency…Businesses sued by the state face penalties of $10,000 for a first offense and $20,000 for a second offense…”

New Jersey accused seven filling stations and a hotel of gouging customers during the state of emergency after Hurricane Sandy by raising prices as much as 59 percent.

The storm last week killed more than 100 people, triggered an almost 14-foot tidal surge, displaced thousands and knocked out power to millions. It crippled mass transit and interrupted supplies of gasoline.

“We warned merchants again and again not to violate the law by taking advantage of people following this catastrophe,” Chiesa said. “The fact that we have these fringe businesses that think that disasters are a profit center is troubling.”

The state Division of Consumer Affairs got 2,000 complaints about price gouging for gasoline, generators, food and lodging, according to Chiesa. About 83 percent involved gas stations, he said. About 4 percent of the state’s 2,400 gas retailers were subject to subpoenas.

For more: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-11-09/new-jersey-plans-price-gouging-suits-against-8-businesses

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: New Jersey Hotels Sued For "Price Goughing" During Superstorm Sandy; Fines Up To $10,000

Filed under Insurance, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , ,

by | November 7, 2012 · 7:48 am

Hospitality Industry Security Risks: Florida Hotel And Management Company Ordered To Pay $1.7 Million To Victim Of "Car Jacking" In Parking Lot; "Inadequate Hotel Security And Burned Out Lights In Parking Area"

“…evidence showed “security was present, but spent more time delivering bed items, towels, and bell carts to guests rather than patrolling the exterior of the hotel and serving as a deterrent to crime. The hotel provided a ‘uniformed housekeeper,’ not security…”

In addition, lights that would have illuminated the area where the crime occurred were burned out and hadn’t been replaced for months.

An Orange County jury Friday ordered Hilton Embassy Suites, Interstate Management Company, and SecurAmerica to pay a combined $1.7 million dollars in restitution to Troy Anderson, who was shot in 2008 while parking his car at the Hilton Embassy Suites on Jamaican Court, near International Drive.

Anderson filed a lawsuit in 2009 for the shooting that occurred on the premises of the Hilton Embassy Suites on September 26, 2008, when he was shot multiple times during a car jacking. He sustained serious and life-threatening injuries as a result. (Troy Anderson v. Hilton Hotels, et al., Case No. 2009-CA-040473-O, Fla. 9th Judicial Cir.).

A former Regional Manager, Chuck Klawitter, testified the hotel would “wait until enough lights were burned out to justify getting a ‘hi-light’ to replace the burned out lights.” Klawitter and two other former SecurAmerica employees, Emmanuel Denau, a former Quality Assurance Supervisor, and Rob Wombolt, a former Operations Manager, testified they brought their security concerns to the attention of the hotel and the security company.

Witnesses testified that the area where hotel personnel instructed Mr. Anderson to park his vehicle was “very dark,” even though it was only 50 or 60 feet from the hotel entrance. Crime Scene Investigator (CSI), Gerardo Bloise, Orange County Sheriff’s Department (OCSO), photographed and documented the scene and his photographs confirmed that a critical floodlight intended to illuminate the area where Mr. Anderson parked was not working on the night he was shot. CSI Bloise confirmed in his testimony the area was “very dark.”

Assistant Hotel General Manager, Victor Vergara, claimed and testified at trial, contrary to the evidence, that all the lights were working and the parking lot lighting was “perfect.”

Jurors also learned that a similar strong-armed robbery had occurred in the parking lot of the Embassy Suites ten days prior. Deputy Lourdes Clayton of the OCSO appeared on the scene of the armed robbery ten days earlier and was on the Hilton Embassy Suites’ property for approximately an hour. The hotel and security company denied knowing she was on the property though in following protocol she would have arrived with lights and sirens on as the call was a Code 3 emergency. She also completed an “incident report,” which is a public record and which was brought out in her testimony at trial where she verified she was on the property for “approximately an hour.” The victim who was robbed at gunpoint, 72-year-old Roger Kraft from Ohio, stayed an additional two nights at the hotel, yet the hotel and security company argued he did not tell anyone about being robbed despite the fact his wallet, cash, and credit cards were stolen. Allen told the jury the assertion was “ridiculous.” Mr. Kraft unfortunately passed away a year and a half ago.

For more:  http://news.yahoo.com/orlando-hotel-ordered-pay-1-7-million-dollars-082430903.html;_ylt=A2KJjakMeZpQcGcAaXDQtDMD

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Security Risks: Florida Hotel And Management Company Ordered To Pay $1.7 Million To Victim Of "Car Jacking" In Parking Lot; "Inadequate Hotel Security And Burned Out Lights In Parking Area"

Filed under Crime, Injuries, Insurance, Liability, Maintenance, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , , , ,

by | November 2, 2012 · 6:48 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: "Data Breach Class-Action Lawsuits" Are Increasing As Judges Widen View To Include "Future Damages"; Average Settlements Of $2500 Per Plaintiff

“…Until a couple of years ago, courts would routinely dismiss lawsuits stemming from data breaches, such as the latest in South Carolina, unless the victims could show specific damages. Judges have since widened their view and are awarding class-action status to lawsuits that can show actual damages or a real possibility of future damages…”

The payout for companies on the losing side of a class-action suit can be substantial. A recent survey of data breach litigation found the average settlement award of $2,500 per plaintiff, with mean attorney fees reaching $1.2 million, according to a study by Temple University Beasley School of Law.

How federal courts define the damages people suffer from data breaches is broadening dramatically, leaving unprepared companies at greater risk of big payouts in class-action lawsuits, lawyers from a prominent law firm say.

Jeffrey Vagle, a lawyer with Pepper Hamilton, described as a “sea change” judges’ thinking. “Courts are starting to pick up on the fact that the data that can get out there can cause serious harm, maybe not immediately, but sometime in the near future,” Vagle said.

Examples include a case in which a laptop containing unencrypted personal data of Starbucks employees was stolen. While there was no evidence that the data was misused, the Ninth Circuit Court ruled in 2010 that the risk alone was enough to warrant a lawsuit, Vagle and colleague Sharon Klein said in a Client Alert published on the law firm’s website.

Data breaches have become a fairly common occurrence among companies of all sizes. Last year, 174 million data records were loss in 855 separate incidents, according to a recent report from Verizon. A 2011 Ponemon Institute survey of 583 IT and IT security professionals in the U.S. found that 90 percent of the organizations they represented had suffered at least one data breach.

To lessen potential damages, Pepper Hamilton recommends beefing up technical and physical security wherever possible. While no technology is 100% hacker proof, courts tend to compare what a company has in place to what is considered best practices for businesses of the same size and in the same industry. Taking all reasonable steps to prevent data theft can lessen damages.

Also, information shouldn’t be linked to individuals, unless absolutely necessary, and a notification policy needs to be in place, so people affected by data breaches are warned as quickly as possible.

A bill pending in Congress would set a national standard for data breach notification, replacing the variety of state laws that exist today. Introduced in June, the Data Security and Breach Notification Act would also set maximum damages and define what is considered a breach.

Irrespective of the bill’s fate, companies need to establish clear policies and procedures for handling data breaches when they occur. Klein recommends a dry run to ensure that everyone understands the steps that need to be taken.

“Many companies still believe that it only happens to the other guy,” Klein said. “And because of that, [they] have not done the blocking and tackling and preventative work upfront.”

For more:  http://m.csoonline.com/article/720128/courts-widening-view-of-data-breach-damages-lawyers-say?goback=.gde_922967_member_180838402

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: "Data Breach Class-Action Lawsuits" Are Increasing As Judges Widen View To Include "Future Damages"; Average Settlements Of $2500 Per Plaintiff

Filed under Claims, Crime, Guest Issues, Insurance, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Theft

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | November 1, 2012 · 6:30 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Restaurants And Bars Are Being Sued For "Illegally Playing Licensed Music" By Major Protective-Rights Organizations; "Thousands Of Dollars Per Violated Song"

“…Broadcast Music, Inc. has sued hundreds of establishments across the country, including bars and restaurants in southwest Ohio, for playing BMI-licensed songs without a proper license…a search of civil court records shows that BMI Inc. — one of three main protective-rights organizations — usually settles out of court or gets a summary judgement and, in either case, collects thousands of dollars per violated song…”

Dozens of Ohio businesses have been sued and made to pay tens of thousands of dollars for playing music without proper licensing. The lawsuits are part of a concerted effort by such organizations to enforce copyrights and could serve as a warning to other businesses illegally playing licensed music.

“The entertainment industry is in a frenzy not knowing how to protect – put fences around — their copyrights in the digital age, because there’s nothing really that can preclude a perfect digital copy,” said University of Dayton law professor Tracy Reilly, who teaches courses about real property and intellectual property.

The Pub at The Greene in Beavercreek paid more than $30,000 to BMI after a Southern Ohio United States District Court civil case for playing four BMI-licensed songs such as Van Morrison’s Brown Eyed Girl and Johnny Cash’s I Walk The Line.

“How many times do you go into a restaurant and hear them playing a radio station, for example,” said attorney David Rickert, who represented The Pub but could not speak directly about the case due to a confidentiality clause. “Technically, you need a license for that. I think it’s something people just aren’t aware of. Now they’re starting to crack down a little bit on it.”

For more:  http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/news/crime-law/area-bars-sued-for-lack-of-music-licenses/nSsqX/

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Restaurants And Bars Are Being Sued For "Illegally Playing Licensed Music" By Major Protective-Rights Organizations; "Thousands Of Dollars Per Violated Song"

Filed under Insurance, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , ,

by | October 24, 2012 · 6:12 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Illinois Hotel Guest Files "Negligence Lawsuit" After Stepping In "Drainage Hole" In Parking Lot; Seeks $50,000 In Damages For Medical And Court Costs

“…it (was)…difficult to see a drainage hole in the parking lot. When he stepped in the hole, Wright says he tore his right meniscus and will need to have a full knee replacement in the next few years to repair the injury…”

An O’Fallon hotel is being sued after one if its guests allegedly hurt his knee when he stepped in a hole in the hotel’s parking lot. Samuel Wright filed a lawsuit Oct. 5 against Kingston Hotel Group LLC in St. Clair County Circuit Court.

According to the petition, Wright and his family were staying at the Candlewood Suites in O’Fallon in July 2011. Wright says he left the hotel through the west exit door to go to his car in the parking lot. The surface of the parking lot was exceptionally dark, Wright claims, because of some asphalt sealant the hotel had applied to it.

Wright accuses Kingston Hotel Group, the owner of the hotel, of negligence for allegedly failing to warn guests of the potential hazard in the parking lot. He asks for more than $50,000 in damages for medical expenses and court costs.

For more: http://madisonrecord.com/issues/366-personal-injury/247261-candlewood-suites-in-ofallon-sued-over-customers-trip-in-parking-lot

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: Illinois Hotel Guest Files "Negligence Lawsuit" After Stepping In "Drainage Hole" In Parking Lot; Seeks $50,000 In Damages For Medical And Court Costs

Filed under Guest Issues, Injuries, Insurance, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , ,