Tag Archives: Restaurants

by | May 15, 2012 · 7:36 am

Hospitality Industry Restaurant Safety: California Restaurant Playground Areas Face New "Sanitation And Safety Requirements Under State Assembly Bill; Must Post Inspection And Cleaning Plans

Under the bill, sponsored by Democrat Michael Allen of Santa Rosa, restaurants would be required to post signs informing customers that food is not allowed on play structures and to provide adults who ask copies of their playground inspection and cleaning plans.

Fast-food restaurants in California could face new sanitation and safety requirements for the playgrounds they install to attract children. The Assembly on Monday approved a bill that would expand food safety laws to cover the indoor and outdoor playgrounds.

Allen says the bill was promoted by research showing that restaurant playgrounds can be breeding grounds for illness-causing bacteria and are not always well-maintained.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2012/05/14/state/n151405D10.DTL#ixzz1ux75aeHF

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Restaurant Safety: California Restaurant Playground Areas Face New "Sanitation And Safety Requirements Under State Assembly Bill; Must Post Inspection And Cleaning Plans

Filed under Food Illnesses, Guest Issues, Health, Injuries, Legislation, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | May 6, 2012 · 7:23 am

Hospitality Industry Property Risks: Minnesota Restaurant Fire And Water Damage Results In $1 Million Reconstruction; "Discarded Cigarette" On Wood Deck Determined As Cause

“…a cigarette discarded in a flower pot on the deck sparked the fire that, coupled with the water used to extinguish it, caused more than $1 million in damage and closed the restaurant for more than six months…”

Even though the fire was mostly confined to the deck and part of the bar, the damage turned out to be much more severe than originally thought. It was February before the contractor could start reconstruction by gutting the remaining structure.

But Casper’s Cherokee of Eagan, the familiar barn-shaped restaurant and bar on Nicols Road, is on its way back. The restaurant opens Monday, completely refurnished and with some tweaks to the menu. Among them: A Blazin’ Barn Burger — proof that owner Rick Casper has a sense of humor — and Eagan’s Firehouse No. 5 Burger — named in honor of the department that responded to the blaze Oct. 9.

As the staff prepared for reopening last week, there were still lots of details to pin down. Chairs had not yet been delivered. A cement patio soon will be added where the deck once stood.

There was a flurry of staff training, initiating 50 new crew members and refreshing the roughly 20 people who waited for Casper’s to reopen, even though there wasn’t money to pay them past December.

For more:  http://www.startribune.com/local/south/149897095.html

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Property Risks: Minnesota Restaurant Fire And Water Damage Results In $1 Million Reconstruction; "Discarded Cigarette" On Wood Deck Determined As Cause

Filed under Claims, Fire, Insurance, Liability, Maintenance, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | May 4, 2012 · 10:13 am

Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: California Restaurant Found "40% Liable" In $2.5 Million Jury Award To Woman Who Had "Chicken Bone" Stuck In Her Throat While Eating

“…In a verdict delivered April 26 in Contra Costa County, a jury determined Foster Farms, which supplied the poultry for the chicken strips on the pizza, was 60 percent liable for her injuries and Pizza Bytes, which runs several Round Table restaurants in the San Francisco area, was 40 percent responsible…”

A California jury has ordered a poultry producer and a pizza restaurant franchisee to pay $2.5 million to a woman who got a chicken bone stuck in her throat. Calla Felicity, 59, told the Contra Costa Times damage from the bone has turned her from a healthy woman to someone who becomes completely exhausted after walking two blocks. She said she spent 33 days in the hospital immediately after the injury in 2010 with 11 operations and has been back in the hospital several times.

Felicity was eating a barbecued chicken pizza with her mother at a Round Table restaurant in South San Francisco when the bone got stuck.

Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/05/04/Woman-awarded-25M-for-chicken-bone/UPI-68391336149120/#ixzz1tvRtzM61

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Legal Risks: California Restaurant Found "40% Liable" In $2.5 Million Jury Award To Woman Who Had "Chicken Bone" Stuck In Her Throat While Eating

Filed under Guest Issues, Health, Injuries, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , ,

by | May 2, 2012 · 6:53 am

Hospitality Industry Property Risks: Georgia Restaurant Fire Destroys Building; Cause Determined To Be "Careless Smoking"

 “The fire marshal’s office determined the cause of the fire was careless smoking, an improperly discarded cigarette,”

Fire destroyed the Long John Silver’s restaurant at 1281 Thompson Bridge Road Saturday afternoon. “The building is a total loss,” Gainesville Fire Chief Jon Canada said.

When firefighters arrived, Canada said smoke was showing from the entrance side of the restaurant as well as the eaves and roof. Flames broke through the roof, which began collapsing inward, he said.

Firefighters set up a defensive attack with two ladder trucks, Canada said. He said crews were able to knock down the fire just before 4 p.m.

For more:  http://www.gainesvilletimes.com/section/6/article/66809/

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Property Risks: Georgia Restaurant Fire Destroys Building; Cause Determined To Be "Careless Smoking"

Filed under Claims, Fire, Insurance, Liability, Maintenance, Management And Ownership

Tagged as , , , ,

by | April 29, 2012 · 6:53 am

Hospitality Industry Employee Risks: Minnesota Restaurant Must "Reinstate" Fired Workers With "Back Pay" According To National Labor Relations Board Ruling

 “…the judge ruled the workers must be reinstated within 14 days and are eligible for back pay — about $10,000 each…”

Six local Jimmy John’s workers fired more than a year ago should get their jobs back, a National Labor Relations Board judge ruled last week. The workers were fired after plastering parts of the Twin Cities with fliers claiming the restaurant’s customers were at risk of illness because of a sick-day policy requiring workers to find their own replacement if they were sick.

On Friday the judge ruled the workers must be reinstated within 14 days and are eligible for back pay — about $10,000 each, according to an estimate by Erik Forman, who lost his job at the West End Jimmy John’s store in St. Louis Park, Minn.

The stores’ owners have not yet decided whether to appeal the judge’s ruling.

“It’s a big victory. It’s not unexpected for us — we’ve known for a long time that our posters and our right to speak out about health and safety issues are legally protected,” Forman said. “But we’re glad to see that we’re one step closer to getting back to work and exercise our right to organize.”

In a March 2011 letter to franchise co-owner Rob Mulligan, Jimmy John’s workers called the sick-day policy a risk to the public’s safety, as it required workers to find their own replacement or go unpaid if they didn’t work, creating an incentive to work while ill.

For more: http://www.mndaily.com/2012/04/24/fired-jimmy-john%E2%80%99s-workers-work-again-judge-rules

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employee Risks: Minnesota Restaurant Must "Reinstate" Fired Workers With "Back Pay" According To National Labor Relations Board Ruling

Filed under Employment Practices Liability, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management, Training

Tagged as , , , ,

by | April 27, 2012 · 7:02 am

Hospitality Industry Health Risks: Two Wisconsin Women File "Salmonella Sushi Lawsuit" After Eating Sushi Rolls At Local Restaurant; Any Party In "Chain Of Distribution" Potentially Liable Under Product Liability Laws

Food-poisoning cases like the Salmonella sushi lawsuit generally fall under product liability laws. Any party in the product’s chain of distribution — including manufacturers, retailers, and middlemen — can potentially be held liable, depending on the source of contamination.

“…distributors may have removed the packaging before selling it to restaurants, which may not know they’re serving a potentially contaminated product, the Wisconsin victims’ lawyer told MSNBC…”

In a Salmonella sushi lawsuit filed last week, two Wisconsin women, 22 and 33, claim they were severely sickened after eating tuna sushi rolls at a local restaurant, MSNBC reports. The sushi rolls allegedly contained ground yellowfin tuna with Nakaochi Scrape.

California-based Moon Marine USA has recalled 59,000 pounds of raw, ground yellowfin tuna from India, which was packaged as “Nakaochi Scrape AA” or “AAA.”

But distributors may have removed the packaging before selling it to restaurants, which may not know they’re serving a potentially contaminated product, the Wisconsin victims’ lawyer told MSNBC.

Salmonella infections generally lead to diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps within 72 hours, according to the FDA. Victims usually recover after about a week.

But the Wisconsin women’s infections were more severe, and required hospital treatment. One woman was diagnosed with an ulcerated colon, which her personal-injury lawsuit blames on contaminated Nakaochi Scrape.

Scientific tests show the Salmonella sushi victims were sickened by a rare type of bacteria called Salmonella Bareilly, the women’s lawyer said. Investigations are underway to determine where bacteria came from.

For more:  http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/25/tagblogsfindlawcom2012-injured-idUS319130664220120425

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Health Risks: Two Wisconsin Women File "Salmonella Sushi Lawsuit" After Eating Sushi Rolls At Local Restaurant; Any Party In "Chain Of Distribution" Potentially Liable Under Product Liability Laws

Filed under Claims, Food Illnesses, Guest Issues, Health, Insurance, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | April 25, 2012 · 8:41 am

Hospitality Industry Health Risks: Oklahoma Restaurant Chain Faces Multiple Lawsuits After "Salmonella Outbreak"; 68 People Confirmed Infected By Centers For Disease Control (CDC)

 “..(the Plaintiff)..sued the restaurant in February, claiming that she was sick  for two weeks after eating at Taco Bell. She’s seeking more than $75,000 in  damages…”

The Centers for Disease Control said that 68 people — including 16 in Oklahoma  — were infected with salmonella after eating at a “Mexican-style fast-food  restaurant chain.”

Taco Bell is facing a second lawsuit after a Shawnee family said their child  contracted salmonella in Oklahoma. The family said their 9-year-old got sick from eating at the restaurant.  The child spent three days in a hospital with a 105-degree fever, according to  the lawsuit.

A lawsuit filed by a Norman woman who claimed she contracted salmonella  after eating at Taco Bell was transferred to federal court.

In a court filing, Taco Bell denied it was liable for Smith’s illness.  The company asked a federal judge to dismiss it from the lawsuit.
Read more: http://www.koco.com/health/30917551/detail.html#ixzz1t4R5gjdr

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Health Risks: Oklahoma Restaurant Chain Faces Multiple Lawsuits After "Salmonella Outbreak"; 68 People Confirmed Infected By Centers For Disease Control (CDC)

Filed under Food Illnesses, Guest Issues, Health, Insurance, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , ,

by | April 24, 2012 · 6:32 am

Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: California Supreme Court Ruling Mandates That State's Hotels And Restaurants Need Only Make Employee "Meal And Rest Periods Available"; Not Required To Ensure "Actually Taken"

The Court makes clear the following: “When someone is … employed … for five hours, an employer is put to a choice: it must (1) afford an off duty meal period; (2) consent to a mutually agreed-upon waiver if one hour or less will end the shift; or (3) obtain written agreement to an on duty meal period if circumstances permit. Failure to do one of these will render the employer liable for premium pay.” Brinker, p. 35.

At issue in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Court was whether California employers must ensure that their employees actually take their meal and rest periods or merely make them available. To the collective relief of California employers, the court found that an employer must only provide meal and rest periods to its employees, leaving the employees free to use the period for whatever purpose they desire. The employer is not obligated to ensure no work is performed during the period.

The Court continues: “[a]n employer’s duty with respect to meal breaks … is an obligation to provide a meal period to its employees. The employer satisfies this obligation if it relieves its employees of all duty, relinquishes control over their activities and permits them a reasonable opportunity to take an uninterrupted 30-minute break, and does not impede or discourage them from doing so.” Brinker, Slip Opinion, p. 36 (emphasis added).

The Court further acknowledged that what will suffice may vary from industry to industry, but held, “the employer is not obligated to police meal breaks and ensure no work thereafter is performed. Bona fide relief from duty and the relinquishing of control satisfies the employer’s obligations, and work by a relieved employee during a meal break does not thereby place the employer in violation of its obligations and create liability for premium pay.” Brinker, p. 36-7 (emphasis added).

For more: http://hotellaw.jmbm.com/2012/04/brinker_v_superior_court.html

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: California Supreme Court Ruling Mandates That State's Hotels And Restaurants Need Only Make Employee "Meal And Rest Periods Available"; Not Required To Ensure "Actually Taken"

Filed under Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Training

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | · 6:32 am

Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: California Supreme Court Ruling Mandates That State's Hotels And Restaurants Need Only Make Employee "Meal And Rest Periods Available"; Not Required To Ensure "Actually Taken"

The Court makes clear the following: “When someone is … employed … for five hours, an employer is put to a choice: it must (1) afford an off duty meal period; (2) consent to a mutually agreed-upon waiver if one hour or less will end the shift; or (3) obtain written agreement to an on duty meal period if circumstances permit. Failure to do one of these will render the employer liable for premium pay.” Brinker, p. 35.

At issue in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Court was whether California employers must ensure that their employees actually take their meal and rest periods or merely make them available. To the collective relief of California employers, the court found that an employer must only provide meal and rest periods to its employees, leaving the employees free to use the period for whatever purpose they desire. The employer is not obligated to ensure no work is performed during the period.

The Court continues: “[a]n employer’s duty with respect to meal breaks … is an obligation to provide a meal period to its employees. The employer satisfies this obligation if it relieves its employees of all duty, relinquishes control over their activities and permits them a reasonable opportunity to take an uninterrupted 30-minute break, and does not impede or discourage them from doing so.” Brinker, Slip Opinion, p. 36 (emphasis added).

The Court further acknowledged that what will suffice may vary from industry to industry, but held, “the employer is not obligated to police meal breaks and ensure no work thereafter is performed. Bona fide relief from duty and the relinquishing of control satisfies the employer’s obligations, and work by a relieved employee during a meal break does not thereby place the employer in violation of its obligations and create liability for premium pay.” Brinker, p. 36-7 (emphasis added).

For more: http://hotellaw.jmbm.com/2012/04/brinker_v_superior_court.html

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: California Supreme Court Ruling Mandates That State's Hotels And Restaurants Need Only Make Employee "Meal And Rest Periods Available"; Not Required To Ensure "Actually Taken"

Filed under Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Training

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | April 7, 2012 · 1:49 am

Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Labor Department Investigation Forces Massachussetts Restaurants To Repay Employees For Back Wages And Incorrect Overtime

“…investigation found that several restaurants “violated the FLSA by paying  employees flat salaries for all hours worked without overtime pay, failing to  combine hours worked at multiple locations for overtime purposes, paying  incorrect overtime rates to tipped employees, making illegal deductions from  employees’ wages and failing to keep accurate records of employees’ hours….”

“…Even  more serious, our investigations found an emerging trend of misclassifying  restaurant workers as independent contractors in order to avoid minimum wage,  overtime and record-keeping requirements of the FLSA.”

Dozens of eateries around the state are paying employees for back wages as a  result of an ongoing enforcement initiative conducted by the U.S. Department of  Labor.

To date, investigations by the Boston District Office of the department’s  Wage and Hour Division have found $1,307,808 in back wages due to 478 employees  of 34 different Massachusetts restaurants.

Fifteen Not Your Average Joe’s locations have been cited, including the one  on Enon Street in Beverly, which is to pay nine employees a total of $44,201.73  in back wages.

The investigation, according to a release by the U.S. Department of Labor,  uncovered significant violations of the minimum wage, overtime and  record-keeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act in many Massachusetts  restaurants.

Read more: Beverly restaurant to pay employees for back wages – Beverly, MA – Beverly Citizen http://www.wickedlocal.com/beverly/newsnow/x221034920/Beverly-restaurant-to-pay-employees-for-back-wages#ixzz1rJqNdvfO

Comments Off on Hospitality Industry Employment Risks: Labor Department Investigation Forces Massachussetts Restaurants To Repay Employees For Back Wages And Incorrect Overtime

Filed under Insurance, Labor Issues, Liability, Management And Ownership, Risk Management

Tagged as , , , , , ,